<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InternetVPS &#8211; $4.99 64MB OpenVZ VPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/</link>
	<description>Hosting Websites on Bare Minimum VPS/Dedicated Servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bevan Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Bevan Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Yes they re-sell burstnet servers, I had a dedicated server their with a friend. How ever I&#039;m pretty sure this is a one man show operation, network notices etc seem to be copied word for word from burstnet&#039;s site. Burstnet don&#039;t allow torrents........ internetvps does..... hmmmmm

I think the guy running the operation is a bit full of himself, be careful with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they re-sell burstnet servers, I had a dedicated server their with a friend. How ever I&#8217;m pretty sure this is a one man show operation, network notices etc seem to be copied word for word from burstnet&#8217;s site. Burstnet don&#8217;t allow torrents&#8230;&#8230;.. internetvps does&#8230;.. hmmmmm</p>
<p>I think the guy running the operation is a bit full of himself, be careful with this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had the $5/mo. plan for a few months and it works fine for me.

The RAM and B/W specs currently offered are 2x better than when reviewed here.

The storage is still 3G which isn&#039;t as attractive as some of the other $5/mo. VPS plans that have apparently popped up in the past couple of months.

But I can&#039;t help but say, hey, I&#039;ve been using this service for a few months and it works fine for me.

The only negative points I have are:

1. I had to pay for a whole year, which I know is risky with a ultra-budget host, but at the time there didn&#039;t seem to be any alternative to pay-per-year in this price segment (unlike today, I only saw two options at $5/mo. when I was in the market).  Anyhow the risk $60 isn&#039;t too huge.

2. Sometimes the bandwidth seems a bit cheap.  I mean generally it is fast, but sometimes I can&#039;t get connections to certain Internet hosts from my VPS but I can connect to those hosts from home.  No biggie because I can work around this when it happens.

The major positive points that I have about this service are:

1. In the few months that I&#039;ve had it, the company hasn&#039;t gone out of business and my server hasn&#039;t gone offline.

2. My server never seems overloaded.

3. The network speed, for the most part, always seems reasonable to me.

Anyhow, I felt compelled to say something since there&#039;s pretty much no mention of this service anywhere on the Internet except for here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the $5/mo. plan for a few months and it works fine for me.</p>
<p>The RAM and B/W specs currently offered are 2x better than when reviewed here.</p>
<p>The storage is still 3G which isn&#8217;t as attractive as some of the other $5/mo. VPS plans that have apparently popped up in the past couple of months.</p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t help but say, hey, I&#8217;ve been using this service for a few months and it works fine for me.</p>
<p>The only negative points I have are:</p>
<p>1. I had to pay for a whole year, which I know is risky with a ultra-budget host, but at the time there didn&#8217;t seem to be any alternative to pay-per-year in this price segment (unlike today, I only saw two options at $5/mo. when I was in the market).  Anyhow the risk $60 isn&#8217;t too huge.</p>
<p>2. Sometimes the bandwidth seems a bit cheap.  I mean generally it is fast, but sometimes I can&#8217;t get connections to certain Internet hosts from my VPS but I can connect to those hosts from home.  No biggie because I can work around this when it happens.</p>
<p>The major positive points that I have about this service are:</p>
<p>1. In the few months that I&#8217;ve had it, the company hasn&#8217;t gone out of business and my server hasn&#8217;t gone offline.</p>
<p>2. My server never seems overloaded.</p>
<p>3. The network speed, for the most part, always seems reasonable to me.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I felt compelled to say something since there&#8217;s pretty much no mention of this service anywhere on the Internet except for here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/internetvps-499-64mb-openvz-vps/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>My VPS has 25% uptime, woohoo :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My VPS has 25% uptime, woohoo :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

