Comments on: G&Z Host – $6.95 256MB Xen VPS Exclusive Offer

By: GnZhost

GnZhost — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:49:48 +0000

We have some problem with the kernel that is why you see packet loss and now is corrected

@drmike

We have swap in all xen packages and is the same as the dedicated ram.

By: drmike

drmike — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:58:25 +0000

Forgot to point out:

No swap? (I think Xen is the one with swap and not burst memory.)

By: drmike

drmike — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:57:59 +0000

I can’t copy and paste for some reason but I;m getting nearly the same results as Wing up there off of a Public wireless network.

By: Joe Merit

Joe Merit — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:51:33 +0000

looks like Quadranet’s Rack inside of Colo4dallas and
not actually colo4dallas.

Their network is kind of funky. I have a vps in softlayer dallas
and the traceroute to 96.44.188.21 actually goes to chicago and then
back to dallas :)

By: Wing Loon

Wing Loon — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:26:28 +0000

My ping result from Colo4Dallas: -

[root@cp1 ~]# ping -c 10  96.44.188.21
PING 96.44.188.21 (96.44.188.21) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=36.9 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=36.6 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=36.5 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=36.4 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=37.0 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=36.8 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=7 ttl=49 time=36.8 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=8 ttl=49 time=37.4 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=9 ttl=49 time=36.3 ms
64 bytes from 96.44.188.21: icmp_seq=10 ttl=49 time=36.1 ms

--- 96.44.188.21 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.103/36.721/37.437/0.373 ms